在我的開發(fā)工作中經(jīng)常會遇到需要判斷一個函數(shù)是否是JavaScript原生函數(shù)的情況，有時候這是一個很必要的工作，你需要知道這個函數(shù)是瀏覽器自身提供的，還是由第三方封裝、偽裝成原生函數(shù)。當(dāng)然，最好的方法是考察執(zhí)行這個函數(shù)的toString方法的返回值。

The JavaScript

完成這個任務(wù)的方法非常簡單：

function isNative(fn) {return (/{s*[native code]s*}/).test(’’ + fn);}

toString方法會返回這個方法的字符串形式，然后用正則表達(dá)式判斷里面包含的字符。

更強(qiáng)悍的方法

Lodash的創(chuàng)始人John-David Dalton找到了一個更佳的方案:

;(function() { // Used to resolve the internal `[[Class]]` of values var toString = Object.prototype.toString; // Used to resolve the decompiled source of functions var fnToString = Function.prototype.toString; // Used to detect host constructors (Safari > 4; really typed array specific) var reHostCtor = /^[object .+?Constructor]$/; // Compile a regexp using a common native method as a template. // We chose `Object#toString` because there’s a good chance it is not being mucked with. var reNative = RegExp(’^’ + // Coerce `Object#toString` to a string String(toString) // Escape any special regexp characters .replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[]/]/g, ’$&’) // Replace mentions of `toString` with `.*?` to keep the template generic. // Replace thing like `for ...` to support environments like Rhino which add extra info // such as method arity. .replace(/toString|(function).*?(?=()| for .+?(?=])/g, ’$1.*?’) + ’$’ ); function isNative(value) { var type = typeof value; return type == ’function’ // Use `Function#toString` to bypass the value’s own `toString` method // and avoid being faked out. ? reNative.test(fnToString.call(value)) // Fallback to a host object check because some environments will represent // things like typed arrays as DOM methods which may not conform to the // normal native pattern. : (value && type == ’object’ && reHostCtor.test(toString.call(value))) || false; } // export however you want module.exports = isNative;}());

現(xiàn)在你也看到了，很復(fù)雜，但更強(qiáng)大。當(dāng)然，這不是為了做安全防護(hù)，它只是給你提供是否是原生函數(shù)的相關(guān)信息。